Monday, October 15, 2012
Quality of Baseball...It depends on where you play. There are some California, Texas, Georgia and Florida D-II's that would be very competitive with small conference D-I's in the Midwest and Northeast. UC San Diego comes to mind. While D-I is better overall from a talent standpoint, there is some great ball being played at D-II.
Quality of Coaching...Again, there have been and are some very good D-II coaches that can flat out coach. Andy Lopez at Arizona coached at Cal State Dominguez Hills, Dan O'Brien at Santa Clara had great success at UC San Diego are just a few examples. There may be more quality coaches at the D-I level, but D-II coaching has recently been a great stepping stone to the next level.
Quality of Scouts...No Doubt, more scouts hang out where the talent is more abundant, but if a player can play, they will be found. A case in point, SF Giants Ryan Vogelsong played at a D-II...and here locally, Sonoma State has had quite of few players drafted in recent years...more than a few California D-I's.
Quality of Education...In my state of California, I can argue that Cal Poly Pomona, UC San Diego, Cal Baptist, Azuza Pacific and I am sure a whole lot more in other states that are better than most D-I's academically. There is a lot of parity academically between Fresno State, San Jose St, Sacramento State, Long Beach, Fullerton and Northridge and their D-II Cal State counterparts. Education is why you are going to college in the first place right? You may be surprised at how much better a D-II education can be.
Quality of Facilities...Here in California, there are a few D-I's that don't measure up from a facilities standpoint...For example, there aren't many facilities worse than USF and UCSB...regardless of the Division.
Northridge, Bakersfield and San Jose States Blethen Field (part time with Muni...which is a great stadium) are very mediocre and there are many D-II's that are at least equal or better. But, for the most part, D-I's have the better facilities because football money brings in the revenue. But again, no school is going to 100% perfect...Measure all the positives before making a decision.
Friday, October 12, 2012
You see, he has been asked to be an college assistant coach and he now is teaching the same disciplines he was asked to perform as a player and it turned something on in his brain that said..."Now I get it"...
The other day, he called and said, "I know now, what I should have known then and...I have set up a couple of Major League baseball try-outs...I am not done."
It is not that much of a stretch...He did start all through a D-I college and has the skills...just not the type of numbers he would have liked. Whether or not he achieves his dreams, it gave me this idea for an article.
If every player put himself in the shoes of a coach, or mentored a undergrad or prospect, would that help that player understand the game better and make the type of adjustments that are needed to succeed?
I think so. In business, we are asked to shadow and are given managerial duties and as we get better, we get more responsibility, more protegees to mentor and so on until we reach the top of the managerial heap.
In baseball, it's all about repetition...but if we take that repetition a bit farther, and allow that player to preach to others what he has been practicing, will that process sink into a players mind indelibly and become more of a natural ability rather than a rote exercise? I think so.
As a manager I have had many teaching experiences to my staff that have become learning experiences for me too. Sometimes, something just clicks.
If your player seems to be struggling mentally, (baseball is pretty much all mental...just ask A-Rod come play-off time) maybe he needs to take the role of teacher, and repeat what he has learned and practiced and teach to others in order for it to sink in to himself. Teaching someone else can also help increase self esteem, confidence, leadership and increase the ability to make the right decisions quicker. That's about 90% of baseball right there.